Vol. 5 No. 7 (July, 1995) pp. 192-194
THE SUPREME COURT REBORN: THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION IN THE
AGE OF ROOSEVELT by William E. Leuchtenburg. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1995. 350 pp. Cloth $30.00.
Review by David G. Barnum, Department of Political Science,
DePaul University.
The constitutional revolution of 1937 holds a continuing
fascination for constitutional scholars, political scientists,
historians, and many others -- for almost anyone, in fact, with
even a passing interest in contemporary American history and the
way in which the Supreme Court has shaped, and been shaped by,
that history. Notwithstanding the fair assumption that the
Supreme Court's acquiescence to the policy initiatives of the New
Deal was all but inevitable, few if any constitutional events
have been as distinct, as dramatic, and as consequential as the
famous "switch in time that saved nine."
Historian William Leuchtenburg's THE SUPREME COURT REBORN
consists of nine essays. All but one originated as an article or
lecture devoted to a relatively specific dimension of the
constitutional crisis of the 1930s, and as such most of the
chapters of the book can be read independently of one another by
anyone interested in the specific subject they address. Taken
together, however, their purpose is to provide a coherent and
multi-faceted picture of the events of the 1930s and the
personalities who shaped them.
Four chapters of the book examine specific Supreme Court
decisions: (1) Buck v. Bell (1927), a case well worth study but
only tangentially relevant, at best, to the constitutional crisis
of 1937; (2) Retirement Board v. Alton R. Co. (1935), an early
anti-New Deal decision invalidating the Railway Retirement Act of
1934 and alerting the Administration (even though Roosevelt had
not been enthusiastic about the legislation itself) that other
New Deal legislation might be in grave trouble with the Court;
(3) Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), repudiating
Roosevelt's ouster of William E. Humphrey from the Federal Trade
Commission, and (4) West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937), the case
which, because it was decided only seven weeks after Roosevelt's
February 5, 1937, announcement of his Court-packing proposal, and
because it upheld a Washington state minimum wage law in the face
of directly contrary precedents, was viewed by many as the
Court's gesture of capitulation to the New Deal. Two chapters
examine the origins of the Court-packing proposal and the
political maneuvering that accompanied its presentation to
Congress and eventual defeat. One chapter looks at the
confirmation battle over Hugo Black, nominated by Roosevelt to
succeed Willis Van Devanter, who had resigned in the midst of the
Court-packing debate. The next-to-last chapter covers "The
Constitutional Revolution of 1937," that is, the string of
decisions commencing in 1937 in which the Court uniformly upheld
New Deal economic and regulatory legislation. The final chapter,
"The Birth of America's Second Bill of Rights," is a
survey of the incorporation controversy from John Marshall's
decision in Barron v. Baltimore (1833) (affirming the historical
understanding that the Bill of Rights restricted only the federal
government) to the eventual application to the states, by 1969,
of all of the important "civil liberties"
Page 193 follows:
protections of the first ten amendments.
The lectures and articles on which most of the chapters are based
were originally delivered or published (or both) over a
twenty-five year period from the mid-1960s to the late 1980s. In
each case, however, they have been updated and revised for
inclusion in THE SUPREME COURT REBORN. One chapter, on the
Railroad Pension case, was written for inclusion in a projected
two-volume history of the Court which will evidently be titled
THE SUPREME COURT IN THE AGE OF ROOSEVELT.
Given that THE SUPREME COURT REBORN consists of chapters on
discrete but overlapping aspects of the constitutional crisis of
the 1930s, there is some repetition. Leuchtenburg acknowledges
this feature of the book, however, and has taken pains to make
the book as seamless as possible in order to render it useful
both to those interested in specific questions and to those
seeking an integrated overview of the events of the time.
The two chapters of greatest interest to political scientists may
be those on the Court-packing plan itself. Leuchtenburg indicates
in his introduction to the "origins" chapter that his
account is "markedly different...from that set forth in the
standard version of Joseph Alsop and Turner Catledge" (p.
82) and that it draws in part on the papers of Homer S. Cummings,
Roosevelt's attorney general. Those papers became available after
the publication of Leuchtenburg's own article on the
Court-packing episode in the 1966 SUPREME COURT REVIEW, and as a
result Leuchtenburg's revised account should be of great interest
to students of the Court-packing episode and the scholarly
controversies it has generated.
Leuchtenberg concludes that many "putative architects"
of the Court-packing plan had little or nothing to do with it (p.
130), that "[s]ave for Cummings, no one in the Cabinet, not
even the ubiquitous [Harold] Ickes, knew of the plan" (p.
126), and that the ultimate decision to propose that the Court be
enlarged by the appointment of additional justices -- rather than
to propose, for instance, that the Constitution be amended to
give the federal government greater power to regulate commerce or
that the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction be restricted.
--was developed by a small group of Justice Department officials,
including Cummings and Departmental consultant and Princeton
professor Edward S. Corwin, with the President himself
"intimately involved throughout" (p. 130).
THE SUPREME COURT REBORN is suffused with quotes from the diaries
of Cummings and Ickes and others, from correspondence among New
Deal decision makers, and from a wealth of other original
sources. The book also draws extensively on the Supreme Court
decisions of the period, on contemporaneous newspaper, magazine,
and book-length accounts of the Court-packing proposal and other
events, and on the mountain of scholarship that the
constitutional crisis of the 1930s has generated. Leuchtenburg's
own interpretive contributions are confined to the interstices of
his text and are perhaps fewer and less bold than one might wish.
The book is capably written and meticulously documented but is
not a fertile
Page 194 follows:
source of provocative historical insights or memorable prose. Its
greatest value lies in the care with which it has collected and
presented the factual ingredients of one of the most intriguing
and consequential periods of American constitutional history.
Copyright 1995