Vol. 21 No. 8 (August, 2011) pp.462-464
ENCOUNTERING RELIGION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE LEGAL RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF
WORKERS AND EMPLOYEES, by Raymond F. Gregory.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010.
280pp. Hardcover. $55.00.
ISBN: 9780801449543. Paperback. $19.95.
ISBN: 9780801476600.
Reviewed by Dylan Weller, Department of Political Science, Hobart and William
Smith Colleges. Email: dweller [at] hws.edu.
ENCOUNTERING RELIGION IN THE WORKPLACE by Raymond F. Gregory, while short on
analysis, is a well-rounded and engaging synopsis of religious discrimination
law. Gregory has written three previous books on the legal rights of workers
regarding age discrimination, gender discrimination, and sexual harassment.
This book on religious discrimination rounds out his investigation of
Title VII cases, providing both a readable overview, as well as a unique
first-hand perspective from a lawyer with decades of experience in the field.
The book is generally well structured, beginning with an examination of some
fundamental questions regarding religious discrimination and the workplace.
Gregory provides a good deal of basic information related to Title VII,
and examines a variety of cases, which serve to illuminate the central points of
contention that can lead to workplace related, religious discrimination claims.
Some common themes include proselytization in the workplace, religious
symbols and garb, the observance of religious rituals inside the workplace, and
the observance of religious holidays requiring absence from work.
Gregory also examines a variety of cases related specifically to religion
in the public-sector workplace, drawing careful distinctions between the
differing obligations of both public-sector and private-sector employers.
In one of the most intriguing sections of the book, Gregory turns to some
interesting exemptions to religious discrimination laws granted to religious
institutions. The book concludes
with some general principles regarding both employers’ and employees’
responsibility to find reasonable accommodation for religious practices; as well
as some summary remarks on the importance of exploring alternatives to
litigation.
As Gregory observes, many of the basic issues pertaining to Title VII claims are
seemingly simple questions that prove exceedingly difficult for courts to
uniformly address. Gregory makes
use of an amply stocked supply of case summaries to wade through murky judicial
waters, taking considerable time to ponder a variety of perplexing questions:
What is a religion, legally defined?
Will an employer run afoul of Title VII if an employee is fired for
belonging to a “religious” group whose sole mission is the advancement of white
supremacist ideology? How do the
courts determine sincerity of belief?
If an employee suddenly avows an increased devotion to observing the
Sabbath after being asked to work a weekend shift, are the courts likely to
accept the employee’s profession of belief?
Gregory recounts case after case, [*463] drawing attention to the
difficulties courts face in attempting to iterate some general guidelines for
assessment. The book highlights
those areas in which legal precedent has been clearly established, while
remaining always attuned to the areas of Title VII law that are less concretely
defined.
Gregory borrows from his many years as a litigator in recounting a wide variety
of cases related to Title VII religious discrimination claims.
A number of these referenced cases are pulled from his own experience.
There are moments within the text when Gregory’s perspective as a legal
advocate for the victims of discrimination comes through clearly, and one may
detect a slight hint of bias in his recounting of a few cases.
Gregory clearly and passionately illustrates the vulnerable position of
workers, forced to choose between job security and religious principle.
Generally, however, Gregory’s authorial voice remains largely objective,
and no less sympathetic to the plight of employers, who often struggle, through
the best of intentions, to navigate the legal minefield of discrimination
claims. As Gregory repeatedly
emphasizes, employers can find themselves caught between two equally compelling
claims to Title VII protection; forced to choose between one employee’s right to
free expression on the one hand, and another employee’s freedom from religious
harassment on the other. This
generally balanced perspective, which is sympathetic to the difficulties faced
by both employees and employers, offers the reader a pragmatic understanding of
the complexity at the heart of these Title VII claims.
The heart of the book resides in the many case summaries used throughout the
text. These summaries are clear,
concise, and often compellingly written, though the sheer volume of case
summaries (around 150 over the entire book) can be overwhelming at times.
Indeed, certain cases are similar enough to others that they fail to
offer much new insight. A smaller
pool of selectively chosen cases could have effectively illuminated pertinent
legal distinctions while avoiding repetition.
Furthermore, although the case summaries are engaging and frequently
offer clear insights on their own, there are multiple points throughout the text
where further analysis from the author on the placement of specific cases within
the broader framework of Title VII legal theory would have been enlightening.
Those readers searching for a historical analysis of Title VII religious
discrimination claims may also feel somewhat frustrated by the sparse attention
paid to the evolving judicial trends regarding these cases over time.
Although Gregory does comment on some significant shifts in legal trends
occasionally throughout the book, the cases are not presented in any
chronological fashion.
Gregory writes that lay people as well as lawyers not versed in employment law
make up his intended audience for this book, and indeed, this book is written in
a very accessible style, free from legal jargon and complex legal analysis.
The writing is engaging, and the many examples offered throughout the
book add narrative texture to the more esoteric legal theory.
This is most certainly a strength in terms of accessibility, but of
course a more informed reader may find themselves wishing for a more [*464]
penetrating analysis of the subject.
Overall, however, I found the use of so many case studies to be
enlightening rather than distracting.
The sheer preponderance of cases, even those that are less distinct than
others, gives the reader a clearer sense of how varied and complex these claims
can be. I would recommend this book
for classes on workplace discrimination as well as classes more generally
focused on religion and the law, with the understanding that some supplemental
analysis may be required to add depth to this thoughtfully gathered and nicely
summarized selection of cases.
*********************
© Copyright 2011 by the author, Dylan Weller.